Answer:
1: Entrapment
Step-by-step explanation:
In the given scenario, the appropriate defense would be option 1: Entrapment.
Entrapment occurs when law enforcement officers induce or persuade someone to commit a crime that they would not have otherwise committed. The key elements of entrapment are:
1. Inducement: The police officer actively encourages or persuades the individual to commit the crime.
2. Lack of Predisposition: The individual was not already inclined or willing to commit the crime before the police officer's involvement.
In this case, the undercover police officer induced the individual to commit the crime and then arrested her. The defense of entrapment would be appropriate because the officer's actions would be considered unfair and unethical if they coerced or manipulated the individual into committing the crime.
It's important to note that the defense of entrapment focuses on the conduct of law enforcement rather than the guilt or innocence of the accused. The defense aims to prevent abuses of power and protect individuals from being unfairly targeted by law enforcement.
If the defense of entrapment is successfully argued, it can result in the charges being dismissed or the accused being acquitted.
I hope this helps!