Register

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Dred Scott case? A The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. B Popular sovereignty was the only legal way to settle the slavery debate.…

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Dred Scott case? A The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. B Popular sovereignty was the only legal way to settle the slavery debate.…
asked 168k views
5 votes
How did the Supreme Court rule in the Dred Scott case? A The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. B Popular sovereignty was the only legal way to settle the slavery debate. C The Fugitive Slave Act was unconstitutional. D The Constitution protected slave holding as a property right.

asked
User Arnaud Leymet
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional

Step-by-step explanation:

A.

answered
User Silvans Solanki
by
8.6k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.

Categories

Other Questions

Jacinda makes collections on real estate loans. Last year, she made approximately 20 collections and collected $38,000. Must Jacinda be licensed?
Outline the process by which most federal judges are nominated and approved
When an excessive amount of alcohol is consumed causing a person to stop or breath slowly, vomit in their sleep. or appear pale or bluish the person is possibly suffering from • Binge drinking Intoxication
Link Copied!