Final answer:
To compare interviewee understanding with research gathered, one should consider interview evidence and field research, ensuring open-ended questions are used, and reflect on the interview process for rapport and comprehensive data collection.
Step-by-step explanation:
When comparing interviewees' understanding of youth risky behavior with the research you have gathered, it is essential to consider the evidence of interview research, which includes understanding the respondents' experiences and insights. This can be compared to field research and thick description, which offer a detailed and nuanced view of the context in which behaviors occur. To accurately reflect on these behaviors, questions are designed to be open-ended and non-directive to capture genuine responses without influencing the interviewees. Such research techniques allow for a comprehensive analysis of various factors influencing youth behavior, including societal views on issues like alcohol consumption and the impacts of family dynamics on decision-making.
Reflecting on the interview process can reveal whether the conversation was relaxed enough to gather sufficient information and how it differed from a formal interview setting. This reflection can shape future research by identifying the need for rapport, knowledgeable interviewees, and possibly additional follow-up questions. Understanding and empathizing with subjects may lead to a richer data collection and more accurate representation of the complexities of youth risky behavior.