In my opinion, photography is a different art form than drawing, painting and sculpture for several reasons. Some of them are:
- Photography is based on capturing light and images with a camera, while drawing, painting and sculpture are based on creating images or forms with various materials and tools.
- Photography is more realistic and accurate in representing the appearance of things, while drawing, painting and sculpture can be more expressive and imaginative in interpreting the essence or meaning of things.
- Photography is more instantaneous and spontaneous in recording a moment in time, while drawing, painting and sculpture are more deliberate and meditative in developing a vision over time.
- Photography is more dependent on technology and equipment, while drawing, painting and sculpture are more dependent on skill and technique.
- Photography is more influenced by the external environment and conditions, while drawing, painting and sculpture are more influenced by the internal mood and intention of the artist.
Of course, these differences are not absolute or exclusive. There are many examples of photography that are creative, artistic, abstract, or impressionistic. There are also many examples of drawing, painting and sculpture that are realistic, documentary, or factual. The boundaries between these art forms are not fixed or rigid. They can overlap, complement, or challenge each other in various ways. However, I think these differences reflect some general tendencies and characteristics that distinguish photography from drawing, painting and sculpture as art forms. I hope this answer helps you understand my opinion.