Question

After years of research, a scientist thinks he has isolated a plant compound that is an effective

mosquito repellent. The scientist develops controlled experiments to determine the effectiveness of
the isolated compound repellent on different species of mosquitoes. The experimental results
indicate that the isolated compound effectively stops 10 out of the 15 tested mosquito species from
biting when the repellent is applied to the surface of skin. Before publishing the results, what must
the scientist do to show that the conclusion is unbiased? Pleaseeee answer this question I need help and fasttttttt. ill give a large amount to anyone who can answer this question!!!!!!

Answer 1

To show that the conclusion is unbiased before publishing the results, the scientist should follow these steps:

1. Randomized Selection: The scientist should ensure that the selection of mosquito species for the experiment is randomized. This means that the choice of which mosquito species to test the repellent on should be made without any bias or preference.

2. Control Group: The scientist should include a control group in the experiments. This means that a group of mosquitoes should be tested without applying the isolated compound repellent. The control group allows the scientist to compare the effectiveness of the repellent with the natural behavior of the mosquitoes.

3. Replication: The scientist should repeat the experiments multiple times to ensure that the results are consistent and not influenced by chance or random factors. By conducting the experiments multiple times, the scientist can increase the reliability of the conclusions drawn from the results.

4. Statistical Analysis: The scientist should use statistical analysis to determine the significance of the results. This involves calculating the probability that the observed effect is due to chance. By applying statistical tests, the scientist can determine if the observed results are statistically significant and not just a result of random variation.

5. Peer Review: Before publishing the results, the scientist should submit the findings to a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Peer review involves having other experts in the field review the experiments, methodology, and results to ensure the study meets the rigorous standards of scientific research. This helps to minimize bias and ensures that the conclusions are based on solid evidence.

By following these steps, the scientist can demonstrate that the conclusion is unbiased and based on reliable scientific evidence.

Step-by-step explanation:

<3