asked 213k views
5 votes
A.

The data refute the hypothesis because there is not a direct match between temperature change and number of hurricanes.

B.
The data support the hypothesis because when yearly temperature deviations are below normal the yearly number of hurricanes decreases.

C.
The data refute the hypothesis because the yearly change in temperature appears to be random when compared with the number of hurricanes.

D.
The data support the hypothesis because the trend of increasing number of hurricanes matches the trend of increasing global temperature change.

asked
User Alise
by
8.6k points

1 Answer

4 votes

"The data do not support the hypothesis as there is no apparent correlation between the yearly change in temperature and the number of hurricanes."

In this statement, we are discussing a hypothesis that likely posits a relationship between the yearly change in temperature and the number of hurricanes. The term "data" refers to the collected information and observations used to evaluate this hypothesis.

"Support" in this context means that the data would confirm the relationship or show a clear connection between the two variables, temperature change, and the number of hurricanes.

However, the statement indicates that there is "no apparent correlation" between these variables. This means that when examining the data, there is no evident pattern or direct relationship observed between the yearly change in temperature and the number of hurricanes.

Therefore, based on the analysis of the data, the statement concludes that the data do not support the hypothesis. This means that the evidence collected so far does not indicate that there is a significant link between global temperature change and the number of hurricanes.

answered
User Atul Chavan
by
8.5k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.