Answer:
The cultural historian who interviews people who were unemployed during the Great Depression would receive information that the economic historian, who creates a table based on existing unemployment data, would not have access to.
The economic historian's table would provide statistical data, such as the percentage of the population that was unemployed in different regions of the country. This data would be useful for understanding the scale and scope of the unemployment crisis during the Great Depression.
However, the cultural historian's interviews with people who were unemployed at the time would provide a more personal and subjective perspective on the experience of unemployment. The cultural historian would be able to gather firsthand accounts of the emotional and psychological impact of unemployment on individuals and families, as well as the ways in which people coped with the challenges of being out of work during this difficult time.
The cultural historian would also be able to gather information about the social and cultural factors that influenced the experience of unemployment, such as the stigma attached to being out of work or the ways in which race, gender, and class affected access to employment opportunities.
Overall, the cultural historian's interviews would provide a more nuanced and personal understanding of the experience of unemployment during the Great Depression, which would complement the statistical data provided by the economic historian's table.