The power of the Supreme Court in the United States is limited by several checks and balances. Some of these include:
Judicial Review: The Constitution grants the Supreme Court the power of judicial review, which allows it to review the constitutionality of laws passed by Congress and actions taken by the executive branch. However, the Court's decisions can be overturned by a constitutional amendment or by Congress passing a new law that addresses the issue.
Appointments: Justices are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. This provides a measure of political accountability, as the President and Senators can be held accountable by voters for their choices.
Impeachment: Justices can be impeached and removed from office for "high crimes and misdemeanors," which provides another check on their power.
Jurisdiction: Congress has the power to limit the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and lower federal courts, which can prevent them from hearing certain cases.
Constitutional Amendments: The Constitution can also be amended to limit the power of the Supreme Court or to clarify its role in the government.
These checks on the power of the Supreme Court are designed to prevent it from becoming too powerful and to ensure that its decisions are subject to accountability and review. However, they have been criticized by some, including Brutus (a pseudonym used by an Anti-Federalist during the ratification debates of the US Constitution), for not going far enough to limit the power of the Court. Brutus argued that the power of judicial review could be used by the Court to undermine the authority of the states and the people, and that the appointments process and impeachment power were insufficient checks on the Court's power. Ultimately, the debate over the proper balance of power between the Supreme Court and the other branches of government remains an ongoing one in the United States.