Answer: John of Leiden would want only adults, rather than infants, to receive baptism because he believed that baptism was a voluntary act of faith that required free will, repentance and awareness of good and evil.
Explanation: John of Leiden was a Dutch Anabaptist leader who moved to Münster in 1533 and became an influential prophet. He turned the city into a millenarian Anabaptist theocracy and proclaimed himself King of New Jerusalem in 1534. He was captured and executed by the Catholic forces in 1536.
Anabaptists were a radical branch of the Protestant Reformation that rejected infant baptism and practiced adult baptism instead. They held that infants were not punishable for sin because they had no awareness of good and evil and thus could not yet exercise free will, repent, and accept baptism. They also believed that baptism was a sign of commitment to a new life in Christ and a covenant with the community of believers.
John of Leiden shared these Anabaptist views on baptism and applied them to his rule in Münster. He denied the validity of infant baptism and accepted only adult baptism, which he regarded as a second baptism for those who had been baptized as infants by other churches. He also made baptism a requirement for citizenship in his kingdom and enforced it by confiscating the property of those who refused. He saw baptism as a way of purifying the city from sin and preparing it for the imminent return of Christ.
Therefore, John of Leiden would want only adults, rather than infants, to receive baptism because he followed the Anabaptist doctrine that baptism was a voluntary act of faith that required free will, repentance and awareness of good and evil. He also used baptism as a tool of social control and religious conformity in his kingdom.
Hope this helps, and have a great day! =)