Final answer:
The gain from the acquisition is $3,923,381.27. The wealth impact for Catherine Smith is $98,084.53. The offer proposed by John Howard does not result in an equal share of the synergy.
Step-by-step explanation:
To calculate the gain from the acquisition, we need to consider the net cash flows and the re-organization and integration costs.
The net cash flow of Big Apple will increase from $1.15 m to $1.9 m per year after the acquisition, starting 5 years from now. The present value of this cash flow is:
(1.9m/1.12⁵) - (1.15m//1.12⁵) = $4.31m
The re-organization and integration costs will be incurred at the end of the first two years after the acquisition. The present value of these costs is:
($250,000/1.12) + ($250,000/1.12²) = $386,618.73
Therefore, the gain from the acquisition is:
$4.31 m - $386,618.73 = $3,923,381.27
(2) To calculate the wealth impact for Catherine Smith, we need to multiply the gain from the acquisition by her shareholding percentage. Catherine Smith owns 5,000 shares of Big Apple, which represents 5,000/200,000 = 0.025 or 2.5% of the shares. The wealth impact for Catherine Smith is:
2.5% x $3,923,381.27 = $98,084.53
(3) The offer proposed by John Howard suggests a stock swap of 4.5 shares of Big Apple for every 8 shares of Small Orange. To evaluate if the synergy will be shared equally, we need to compare the market capitalization of the two companies based on this offer. The market capitalization of Big Apple with the stock swap is:
(4.5 x $20m) + $50m = $140m
The market capitalization of Small Orange would be:
(8 x $11.50) = $92
Therefore, the share of Big Apple in the combined market capitalization is:
($140m / ($140m + $92m)) x 100% = 60.34%
This means that Big Apple will have a greater share of the synergy, not an equal share as proposed by John Howard.