Final answer:
The given scenario is not a binomial experiment because it does not have a fixed number of trials, as trials continue until a defective bulb is found.
Step-by-step explanation:
The situation described where a quality control inspector randomly selects bulbs until a defective one is found does not constitute a binomial experiment. The reason for this is that one of the key criteria for a binomial experiment is not being met - the number of trials in a binomial experiment must be fixed (n trials), which is not the case here since the trials continue until a defective bulb is found, making the number indefinite. Hence, the correct answer to the question is:
D. No, because the number of trials is not fixed.
To classify as a binomial experiment, all three criteria must be satisfied: a fixed number of trials, only two possible outcomes for each trial (success or failure), and all trials must be independent and conducted under identical conditions. In this instance, since the number of trials is not fixed, it does not satisfy the first criterion, disqualifying it as a binomial experiment.