Question

Which of the following would be considered a reimbursable EKG interpretation with normal findings?

o Normal EKG
o 101 bpm, ST, Unchanged from prior EKG
o No acute findings
o 68 bpm, NSR, Nml axis, No ST/T elevation

Answer 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the provided options, the following would be considered a reimbursable EKG interpretation with normal findings:

Normal EKG

The other options indicate specific findings or observations, such as heart rate, ST changes, absence of acute findings, or normal sinus rhythm (NSR) with normal axis and no ST/T elevation. While these may not necessarily indicate abnormalities, they provide additional information beyond a completely

i hope I was helpful