Answer:
Explanation:
To determine which option is the better value, we need to compare the accumulated value of the two policies at the end of 20 years.
Let's start by calculating the accumulated value of the whole life policy after 20 years. The yearly premium for the whole life policy is $3008, and it earns 1.75% interest compounded annually. The formula for compound interest is:
A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)
Where:
A = Accumulated value
P = Principal (yearly premium)
r = Annual interest rate (in decimal form)
n = Number of times interest is compounded per year
t = Number of years
For the whole life policy:
P = $3008
r = 1.75% = 0.0175 (annual interest rate)
n = 1 (compounded annually)
t = 20 (number of years)
A = $3008(1 + 0.0175/1)^(1*20)
A ≈ $3008(1.0175)^20
A ≈ $3008(1.39885)
A ≈ $4205.61
After 20 years, the accumulated value of the whole life policy is approximately $4205.61.
Now, let's calculate the accumulated value of the term life policy with the difference invested in a mutual fund. The yearly premium for the term life policy is $185, and the difference in premiums is $3008 - $185 = $2823. This difference will be invested in a mutual fund with a 3.75% interest rate compounded annually.
Using the same compound interest formula:
P = $2823
r = 3.75% = 0.0375 (annual interest rate)
n = 1 (compounded annually)
t = 20 (number of years)
A = $2823(1 + 0.0375/1)^(1*20)
A ≈ $2823(1.0375)^20
A ≈ $2823(1.91446)
A ≈ $5403.61
After 20 years, the accumulated value of the term life policy with the difference invested in a mutual fund is approximately $5403.61.
Comparing the two accumulated values, we can see that the term life policy with the mutual fund investment is the better value. The difference in accumulated values is $5403.61 - $4205.61 = $1198.
Therefore, the term life policy with the mutual fund investment is better by approximately $1198 at the end of 20 years.