Final answer:
The differences between the original play 'Romeo and Juliet' and the 1968 Zeffirelli film include actors' interpretations, directorial vision, and script modifications. Zeffirelli's film might show changes in scene delivery, omitted sections, or adjusted character portrayals. Unique elements like setting or additional story components can also create distinct versions of the play.
Step-by-step explanation:
The differences between the original play Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare and the 1968 film adaptation by Franco Zeffirelli notably revolve around the actors' interpretations, the director's artistic vision, and certain modifications to the script. For example, Zeffirelli's film might have alterations in delivery, omitted scenes, or changes in character portrayals compared to Shakespeare's text due to time constraints or to make the story accessible to modern audiences. The climactic scene in Shakespeare's play, where Romeo finds Juliet in the tomb, is pivotal—the tension lies in whether Juliet will awaken before Romeo takes his life. In Zeffirelli's adaptation, every detail, from the actor’s performance to the setting, influences how this dramatic moment is received.
Additionally, various productions might take creative liberties such as a unique setting that could change the play's context or adding new elements to the ending, like the Filipino production which incorporated a ritualistic dance. Each production is distinct, whether through cutting part of the text for brevity, like in school matinees, or altering how aggressively a character like Queen Margaret in Richard III is portrayed. It is also essential to always credit the actors rather than the characters for their performance since it is the actors who bring unique interpretations to their roles.