Step-by-step explanation:
Sir Francis Bacon and Sir Isaac Newton were both prominent figures in the field of natural philosophy and scientific method. Bacon's approach to scientific inquiry advocated for empirical observation, analysis, and generalization, while Newton's rules of reasoning emphasized the importance of natural science principles, mathematical reasoning, and experimentation.
If Bacon were to provide a critique of Newton's rules of reasoning, he might argue that Newton relied too heavily on mathematical reasoning and deduction in his scientific methodology, and that this approach was too narrowly focused on measurable or quantifiable phenomena. Bacon would argue for a more inclusive and diverse method that considered a wide range of observation and experience while allowing for creative, lateral thinking in the scientific process.
It is difficult to say which of Bacon's idols may have influenced his critique of Newton's rules, as he drew on a wide range of knowledge and experience gained from his extensive reading, contemplation, and work as a philosopher and statesman. However, Bacon was known to be inspired by ancient Greek philosophers such as Aristotle, who expressed a holistic approach to scientific inquiry, taking into account the full range of human experience and observation.