asked 35.9k views
0 votes
Read the excerpt.

We should give up the useless fight with our students and buy phones for them instead. Some kinds of screen time work well in school. Research, for example, is sometimes done more effectively online rather than tracking down print sources in a library. Screens also helps us connect with people in other locations, creating new digital pen pals. Screens can also be integrated into the classroom to enhance learning instead of distracting from it.

Which statement best explains how the author uses faulty reasoning to serve a purpose?

The author utilizes loaded language to persuade readers to buy phones for students.
The author uses slippery slope to warn about the dangers of eliminating screen time.
The author uses bias to prove how ineffective it is to argue about screen time.
The author uses ad hominem to target parents who refuse to buy phones.

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer: None of the answer options accurately explains how the author uses faulty reasoning to serve a purpose.

The author presents a thesis statement proposing a shift in approach towards screen time in schools, and provides examples of how screens can be used effectively in education. The author does not use any of the faulty reasoning strategies mentioned in the answer options to persuade the reader towards their argument.

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Leibel
by
8.7k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.