asked 171k views
3 votes
Explain the difference between Greek and Muslim contributions to the notion of climate variability

across the earth

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

See the explanation for the full answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Greek and Muslim contributions to global climate variability diverged in approach and methodology.

Aristotle, Hippocrates, and Theophrastus were Greek scholars who investigated the natural world and recorded their findings in their books. Aristotle thought that the earth was made up of four elements: earth, water, air, and fire, and that variations in the proportions of these components created environmental changes. He also noticed that latitude and elevation differences were related to climate changes. Aristotle's disciple Theophrastus examined plants and their relationship to climate and discovered that various plants flourished in different conditions.

Muslim scholars, on the other hand, made substantial contributions to climate research by developing scientific instruments and employing mathematical models. During the Islamic Golden Age, which spanned from the eighth through the fourteenth centuries, improved equipment for monitoring temperature, humidity, and wind direction was developed. Muslim scientists, such as Al-Khwarizmi and Al-Farabi, used mathematical models to anticipate weather patterns and analyze the causes of climate change. These models were created using observations from nature as well as theoretical calculations.

Therefore, Greek contributions to the climate variability concept involved observing and recording natural events. In contrast, Muslim contributions concerned the construction of scientific instruments and mathematical models to explain and predict climatic patterns.

answered
User Tarun Sapra
by
9.0k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.