asked 43.5k views
1 vote
20points please help

Select ALL the correct answers.


Which two arguments support judicial restraint?



It is the job of the court to defer to the policy decisions of the executive branch.



It is the job of the court to consider precedent.



It is the job of the court to consider changing social conditions and values.



It is the job of the court to shape social policy.

asked
User Adrodoc
by
8.6k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

It is the job of the court to consider precedent.
It is the job of the court to defer to the policy decisions of the executive branch.

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Malibur
by
7.7k points
5 votes
The correct answers are:

It is the job of the court to consider precedent.

It is the job of the court to defer to the policy decisions of the executive branch.

Step-by-step explanation:

Judicial restraint is a philosophy that advocates for judges to limit their power and defer to the decisions of elected officials whenever possible. It emphasizes the importance of following legal precedent and not making decisions based on personal opinions or political beliefs.
answered
User Frhyme
by
8.2k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.