Final answer:
Susan's method of thoughtfully considering decisions to avoid bias exemplifies 'rationality and thinking slow', a deliberate effort in decision-making that contrasts with quick, intuitive judgments known as 'thinking fast'.
Step-by-step explanation:
Susan, a top executive, prefers to take a long time to think about decisions, utilizing reasoning to work through the decision-making process and aiming to avoid bias. This scenario is an example of rationality and thinking slow, in contrast to relying on quick, intuitive judgments often prone to cognitive biases and errors. Cognitive biases, such as heuristics or mental shortcuts, lead to quick but sometimes inaccurate decisions, as they often take the path of least cognitive resistance. The rigorous process Susan employs indicates a deliberate and effortful approach to problem-solving, echoing the dual-process theory described by psychologist Daniel Kahneman, where thinking slow encompasses the more analytic and deliberate thought systems in contrast to the fast, automatic, intuitive responses of thinking fast.