Question

PLS HELPP ASAP

Feature
Two Pieces on Animal Experimentation
Thomas Dixon

Animal Experimentation - Pro

Experiments on animals should be considered on a case-by-case basis. The proper principle to apply, however, is that the reduction of human suffering is our first priority and the prevention of animal suffering or death is secondary to that (although still important). So that if there is a decent chance that an experiment will result in an important medical breakthrough that will reduce human suffering and death then it is justifiable to allow animal suffering. Animal experimentation is the (sometimes distasteful) means to much greater ends.

Although in principle it is more important to reduce human suffering that to prevent animal suffering, in practice it is possible (and absolutely right) to keep animal suffering to an absolute minimum. Animal experimenters should aspire to the highest levels of animal welfare in their laboratories, using anesthetics wherever possible and keeping animals in clean, comfortable, and healthy conditions. In short, it is possible to experiment on animals without being cruel to animals.

Animal Experimentation - Con

Animals have the right to be treated as beings of value in themselves, not as the means to human ends; this principle must be applied in order to guarantee the end of cruelty to animals. The application of this principle means that animals should never be experimented upon whatever the potential gain for humanity. To infect monkeys with the AIDS virus or to expose rodents to toxic chemicals and radiation is simply not acceptable, whatever the supposed benefits.

In practice, as everyone knows, animals are not routinely treated well by animal experimenters. Apart from the fact that millions of animals die each year in experiments, others are often not adequately anesthetized and are abused by handlers and experimenters. It is idealistic to suppose that this will ever stop as long as society endorses vivisection.
Question
If the writer wished to add a concluding statement to the end of the first paragraph of "Animal Experimentation- Con," which of these choices would be most appropriate?
Responses

A Cruelty is cruelty, and must never be tolerated, regardless of the circumstances.Cruelty is cruelty, and must never be tolerated, regardless of the circumstances.

B It could be argued that hurting animals is an even more egregiously awful act than hurting humans.It could be argued that hurting animals is an even more egregiously awful act than hurting humans.

C Although animals shouldn't be experimented upon in general, some experiments are undeniably worse than others.Although animals shouldn't be experimented upon in general, some experiments are undeniably worse than others.

D Some may say that people are more valuable than animals, but this is beside the point.Some may say that people are more valuable than animals, but this is beside the point.

Answer 1

The most appropriate concluding statement to the end of the first paragraph of "Animal Experimentation- Con" would be:

A Cruelty is cruelty, and must never be tolerated, regardless of the circumstances.

Step-by-step explanation:

This statement reinforces the writer's argument that animals should not be experimented upon, and emphasizes the importance of treating animals with respect and compassion. It also serves as a clear and concise conclusion to the paragraph.