asked 124k views
4 votes
Should the Supreme Court have had the authority to end the national right to abortion that had existed for nearly 50 years? Explain why or why not.

asked
User Kiriko
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

In explanation :)

Step-by-step explanation:

The question of whether or not the Supreme Court should have the authority to end the national right to abortion is a complex one. On one hand, the Supreme Court is tasked with interpreting the Constitution, and determining what rights it protects. Some argue that the Constitution does not explicitly protect the right to an abortion, and that this is a matter that should be left up to the states to decide.

On the other hand, others argue that the right to an abortion is a fundamental right, and that the Supreme Court has a responsibility to protect it. They argue that ending the national right to abortion would have serious consequences for women's health and autonomy, and would undermine the principle of reproductive freedom.

Ultimately, the question of whether or not the Supreme Court should have the authority to end the national right to abortion is a matter of legal interpretation and political opinion. It is a highly charged and contentious issue, and different people will have different views on it.

answered
User Gurupratap
by
8.0k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.