asked 53.9k views
2 votes
a critic of the no child left behind act argues that the federal government has no power to intervene in public education, as it is a right reserved for the state. which constitutional amendment supports the critic's argument?

asked
User Mavis
by
8.7k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Answer:

The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution supports the argument made by the critic of the No Child Left Behind Act that the federal government has no power to intervene in public education, as it is a right reserved for the state. The Tenth Amendment states that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." In other words, the Constitution does not grant the federal government the power to regulate public education, and therefore that power is reserved for the states. The argument against federal intervention in public education is based on the principle of federalism, which divides power between the federal government and the states, and seeks to preserve the autonomy and sovereignty of the states in matters that are not explicitly delegated to the federal government by the Constitution.

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Saad Abdullah
by
7.8k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.