Okay, let's break this scenario down:
5-21. The areas of management involved here are:
- Leadership: You as the controller have to lead in resolving this difficult situation.
- Human resources management: Managing the hiring, performance issues and termination of employees.
- Accounting/Finance: Given that Kelly was brought on to help implement an accounting system and Elizabeth runs the accounting dept.
5-22. The main ethical issues here are:
- Discrimination: Elizabeth may be discriminating against Kelly due to her past struggles, despite her being 15 years sober.
- Fairness: Is it fair to remove Kelly from her new role after she was already hired for it?
- Trust: Did Elizabeth violate trust by reviewing Kelly's private resume behind your back?
5-23. The logical, business-focused approach here would be:
- Weigh the pros and cons of Kelly vs. Elizabeth remaining in their roles. Who is more valuable to the key business needs?
- Determine if either employee's actions warrant discipline or termination. Or if the issues can be resolved professionally.
- Consider if there are any compromises or alternative solutions, e.g. Kelly remaining in a different role, Elizabeth reporting to someone else, etc.
- Make a decision that prioritizes the good of the key business operations and team productivity.
5-21. Given the options, I would try to have a constructive conversation with both Elizabeth and Kelly to find a reasonable resolution, rather than immediately terminating either one.
- Kelly seems a valuable hire, so I would want to try and make the role work if possible.
- Elizabeth also seems a key employee, so losing her should be an absolute last resort.
- With open communication, they may be able to find a way to professionally co-exist or alternative solutions could emerge.
- Only if resolution proves truly impossible would I consider letting either one go. Compromise and pragmatism seem prudent here.
5-25. Based on this limited scenario, I would describe the culture of this company as:
- Fastidious and by-the-book, given how strictly Elizabeth seems to enforce procedures.
- Closed-off, as there is a lack of transparency around key decisions and Elizabeth's actions seem isolating.
- With an undercurrent of politics, as power dynamics and territorialism also seem to be in play.
- However, the company also appears performance-oriented, as under-performing employees would presumably be let go.
- So, a mix of positive and concerning cultural elements based on this dilemma alone. More context would be needed to determine the full culture.