Answer:
The statement by Fortas that armbands do not cause disruption or interference with school activities is important evidence supporting the court's decision because it demonstrates that the students' freedom of expression does not come at the expense of the school's ability to function. In other words, the court recognized that the students had a right to express their views, but also understood the need for schools to maintain order and discipline. By showing that the armbands did not disrupt the educational environment, Fortas was able to argue that the school had no valid reason for suppressing the students' speech. This helped to establish the principle that schools must have a compelling reason for limiting students' free speech rights, and that such limits must be narrowly tailored to achieve a legitimate educational goal.
Hope This Helps!