Question

In the story of "Wild Animals Aren't Pets "

Do you think the author's argument is convincing? Why or why not?​

Answer 1

The author's argument in "Wild Animals Aren't Pets" is that keeping wild animals as pets is unethical and dangerous for both animals and humans. The author provides evidence to support their argument and argues that caring for these animals requires specialized knowledge and training. In my opinion, the author presents a convincing argument.