asked 118k views
5 votes
Scientists often review the results of other scientists' work. Which of the following is a good reason for this review? I. A scientist can receive credit for another scientist's work simply by reviewing it. II. Reviewing scientific results help to ensure that the results are accurate. III. Reviewing scientific results helps to ensure that scientists are objective when they perform experiments. IV. Sometimes additional important questions can be raised when a scientist's work is reviewed. A. I, III, and IV only B. II and IV only C. II, III, and IV only D. I, II, and III only

asked
User Wnm
by
8.7k points

2 Answers

1 vote

Answer:

The correct answer is B. II and IV only.

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

I. A scientist cannot receive credit for another scientist's work simply by reviewing it. Therefore, this option is incorrect.

II. Reviewing scientific results helps to ensure that the results are accurate. This is one of the most important reasons for reviewing scientific work, as it helps to maintain the integrity and credibility of scientific research.

III. Reviewing scientific results does not necessarily help to ensure that scientists are objective when they perform experiments. Therefore, this option is incorrect.

IV. Sometimes additional important questions can be raised when a scientist's work is reviewed. This is another important reason for reviewing scientific work, as it can help to stimulate new ideas and research directions.

Therefore, the only options that are valid are II and IV.

answered
User Solomon Duskis
by
8.6k points
4 votes

Answer:

The correct answer is B) II and IV only.

Step-by-step explanation:

I. A scientist cannot receive credit for another scientist's work simply by reviewing it. Credit is given only to the person or team that did the research.

II. Reviewing scientific results is a crucial step in the scientific process to ensure that the results are accurate and reliable.

III. While reviewing scientific results can help ensure objectivity in the research process, it is not the main purpose of scientific review.

IV. Reviewing scientific results can lead to new and important questions, as well as identify areas for future research.

Therefore, options I and III are incorrect and option B is the best answer.

answered
User Andy Li
by
8.5k points

No related questions found