Answer:
One of Wilson's key strategies was to pursue a policy of neutrality, which meant that the United States would not take sides in the conflict and would remain neutral in its dealings with both the Allied and Central Powers. However, Wilson's own actions undercut this policy in several ways.
Firstly, Wilson issued a series of diplomatic statements that appeared to favor the Allied Powers. For example, in his address to Congress on April 2, 1917, Wilson urged the United States to enter the war on the side of the Allies, arguing that it was necessary to make the world "safe for democracy". This statement signaled to both sides that the United States was no longer a neutral party and would likely join the war effort.
Secondly, Wilson's decision to continue arming merchant ships carrying supplies to the Allies also undermined his policy of neutrality. This decision provoked a series of attacks by German submarines, including the sinking of the Lusitania in 1915, which killed over 1,100 civilians, including 128 Americans. Although Wilson initially protested these attacks, he eventually authorized the arming of American merchant ships, which further escalated tensions with Germany.
Finally, Wilson's support for the Allied Powers also led him to implement a series of economic policies that favored the Allies over the Central Powers. For example, the United States extended credit to the Allies to purchase American goods, while at the same time imposing an embargo on trade with Germany. These policies further eroded Wilson's policy of neutrality and signaled to Germany that the United States was aligned with the Allies.
In conclusion, while Woodrow Wilson attempted to keep the United States out of World War I through a policy of neutrality, his own actions, including his public statements, military decisions, and economic policies, ultimately undercut this effort and contributed to the United States' eventual entry into the war.
Step-by-step explanation:
There is a little something to get you started.