Final answer:
One way to counter the skeptical thesis is to challenge the notion of absolute certainty as a requirement for knowledge. It is possible to have justified beliefs based on evidence and reasoning, even if there is a small possibility of error or uncertainty. By recognizing the limitations of knowledge, we can still seek knowledge and make reasonable judgments.
Step-by-step explanation:
One way to get around the skeptical thesis that things are inapprehensible and that no one has any knowledge is by challenging the notion of certainty as a strict measure of justification. The skeptical argument relies on doubt and the possibility of being deceived, such as the idea that we might be brains in vats or living in a simulation. However, it is possible to have knowledge without absolute certainty.
For example, we can have justified beliefs based on evidence and reasoning, even if there is always a small possibility of error or misunderstanding. By recognizing the limits of knowledge and understanding, we can still seek knowledge and make reasonable judgments based on available evidence.