asked 175k views
3 votes
Which of the following is an assumption, that is required for the Art historian to draw his conclusion properly?

1) Most art is shocking
2) Stravinsky and Manet received public funding for their art
3) Art used to be more shocking than it currently is
4) Public fund should support art
5) Anything that shocks is an art

asked
User Yetiish
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

An assumption required for the art historian to draw his conclusion properly is that art used to be more shocking than it currently is.

Step-by-step explanation:

An assumption that is required for the art historian to draw his conclusion properly is that art used to be more shocking than it currently is. The conclusion drawn by the art historian likely revolves around the historical evolution of the shock value in art. For this conclusion to be valid, the assumption that art used to be more shocking in the past is necessary. It implies a comparison between the level of shock in historical art and contemporary art.

answered
User Stevebot
by
8.2k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.