Final answer:
Mitchell Gold acted as a moral agent by welcoming people from all backgrounds to his factory. Expressive leadership is more likely to be found in emotionally-driven roles, such as the director of a summer camp for chronically ill children. Carol Gilligan's research indicated prior moral studies overlooked sympathetic reactions, focusing instead on a justice perspective.
Step-by-step explanation:
When Mitchell Gold decided to welcome people from all backgrounds to his factory, he was acting as a moral agent. This term refers to individuals who make ethical decisions and act to uphold moral principles, regardless of the potential impact on business outcomes. In contrast, whistleblowers are individuals who expose unethical practices within organizations; unethical managers engage in behavior that is morally wrong or questionable; and preconventional managers are driven by a desire to avoid punishment or gain personal reward, rather than by ethical considerations.
Regarding expressive leadership, it is more likely to be found in roles where emotional connection and relationship-building are critical. Hence, options like the director of a summer camp for chronically ill children who must cultivate a nurturing and supportive environment would fit this leadership style. This leader is likely to be focused on the well-being and personal growth of the campers, fostering a positive group atmosphere.
In her research, Carol Gilligan suggested that earlier studies on morality may have overlooked the sympathetic reactions to moral situations. Gilligan proposed that these studies were overly focused on a justice perspective, which emphasizes fairness and the application of moral rules, whereas she highlighted the importance of understanding the relational aspects and the context of moral decisions.