Question

I

in chapters 14-17 the narrator leaves his primary thread and begins to tell us of his brother’s experiences. This radically changes the point of view. We can easily understand this as a second-hand narrative. These chapters are more authoritative than hear-say, because the narrator takes time to build his ethos—or his credibility for telling his brother’s tale. How does the narrator build his ethos/credibility throughout the text? Why are we inclined to believe him? Does he sustain his credibility? How does his continued introspection lend itself to the narrative and to his credibility?

Answer 1

can u help me with my question?

Step-by-step explanation: