Final answer:
If Mr. Garrett read banned books, it could expand his understanding of racial injustices, emphasize the importance of free speech, and inspire actions that advance literary diversity. Exposure to such works is a catalyst for personal and societal growth.
Step-by-step explanation:
If Mr. Garrett had read some of the banned books, it might have significantly affected his perspective on a variety of sociopolitical and cultural issues. Reading works that have been banned historically opens an individual to viewpoints and narratives that challenge the status quo and often reveal uncomfortable truths about society. For example, books by Black writers that have faced censorship may have offered Mr. Garrett insights into racial injustices, the complexity of the fight for civil rights, and allowed him to understand how systemic oppression can influence literature and history.
Moreover, engaging with literature that has been deemed objectionable or controversial can lead to a deeper understanding of the value of free speech and the consequences of its restriction. Books such as 'An American Slave' by Frederick Douglass, which was banned in certain contexts, provide profound commentaries on human rights and freedom.
Mr. Garrett's exposure to banned books could also inspire actions and discussions that advance literary diversity, pushing against the often narrow canon that excludes marginalized voices. It could affect how he perceives contemporary problems, such as efforts to curb social issues through prohibition or censorship. Ultimately, reading banned books could serve as a catalyst for personal and societal growth, fostering a more open and critical dialogue about literature and its role in reflecting and shaping human experience.