Final answer:
George Herbert Mead's approach emphasizes the development of the self through stages of social interaction, starting from imitation to role-taking, which contributes to self-awareness. Without enough information on Harris's approach, it is not possible to directly compare it to Mead's. Mead's theory is exemplified by the case study of Danielle, who lacked a developed 'self' due to absence of social interaction.
Step-by-step explanation:
The approach taken by George Herbert Mead is closely associated with the symbolic interactionist approach and emphasizes the micro-level of analysis, particularly in understanding how individuals develop a sense of self through social interaction. Mead proposed that individuals go through specific stages of development, beginning with the preparatory stage where children imitate the actions of those around them, and advancing to the play stage where they begin to take on the roles of others. This developmental process is essential for an individual to become self-aware through the internalization of others' perspectives.
Unfortunately, the information provided lacks details about the approach taken by Harris, thereby making it difficult to accurately describe the difference between Mead and Harris's approaches. For a complete answer, more information on Harris’s perspective would be required, which could discuss whether his theories contrast with Mead's focus on individual interactions, or perhaps delve into differing views on the role of society or culture in the development of the self.
To illustrate Mead's perspective, one might consider the case of Danielle, who grew up without social interaction and thus lacked the ability to see herself from others' viewpoints, leading to an absence of 'self' as defined by Mead.