Question

"Joey tells Chandler that having a duck and a chick is unreasonable. Chandler says that it is not unreasonable because they have taken care of pets before."

Is this an example of the Tu Quoque fallacy?
a) Yes
b) No
c) Unsure
d) Not applicable

Answer 1

No, this is not an example of the Tu Quoque fallacy. Chandler is countering Joey's claim with a relevant example.

Step-by-step explanation:

No, this is not an example of the Tu Quoque fallacy. The Tu Quoque fallacy, also known as the appeal to hypocrisy, occurs when someone dismisses an argument by pointing out that the person making the argument is also guilty of the same behavior. In this scenario, Chandler is not dismissing Joey's argument by pointing out that Joey has also taken care of pets before. He is simply providing an example to counter Joey's claim that having a duck and a chick is unreasonable.