Final answer:
This is an example of inductive reasoning. The argument is based on a generalization about cell phones being easy to use and concludes that microwave ovens are probably not easy to use. However, it lacks specific evidence related to microwave ovens.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is an example of inductive reasoning.
The argument is stating that most cell phones are easy to use, and since microwave ovens are not cell phones, they are probably not easy to use. However, this conclusion is based on a generalization (most cell phones are easy to use) and not on any specific evidence related to microwave ovens.
Therefore, it is important to be cautious when drawing conclusions based on generalizations.