asked 143k views
2 votes
What would be the likely result of allowing a contaminated individual to leave the hot zone without being decontaminated?

a) Nothing; all contaminates would likely be gone after the individual exited the hot zone.
b) The contaminates would likely be transferred to other personnel or equipment, resulting in secondary contamination.
c) The individual would be treated for exposure but is no risk to other.
d) There would be direct contamination of the warm zone.

asked
User Jelgh
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Option B. Allowing a contaminated individual to leave the hot zone without decontamination would likely lead to secondary contamination and direct contamination of the warm zone.

Step-by-step explanation:

If a contaminated individual were to leave the hot zone without being decontaminated, the likely result would be that the contaminates would be transferred to other personnel or equipment, which could result in secondary contamination. This means that the contamination could spread beyond the initially affected area, potentially leading to a broader health crisis. Moreover, without proper decontamination procedures, there would be direct contamination of the warm zone, which is supposed to be a safe area where decontamination processes occur before individuals move to a completely clean zone.

The likely result of allowing a contaminated individual to leave the hot zone without being decontaminated would be secondary contamination. This means that the contaminates on the individual's body or clothing could be transferred to other personnel or equipment, potentially leading to the spread of contamination. It is important to decontaminate individuals before they leave the hot zone to minimize the risk of further contamination.

answered
User Sheunis
by
8.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.