Final answer:
Under DPMAP, there is a formal documented face-to-face discussion required between the agency and its political principals to evaluate functioning and identify improvements. The medium used for this discussion can vary depending on preferences and needs.
Step-by-step explanation:
Under the Defense Performance Management and Appraisal Program (DPMAP), there is a requirement for a formal documented face-to-face discussion between the agency and its political principals. This discussion allows for evaluating the agency's functioning and identifying areas for improvement. It is important to note that the medium used for this discussion can vary, depending on the preferences and needs of the parties involved.
For example, instead of a traditional written document, other mediums such as a slide deck or video presentation could be used to convey relevant information effectively. The choice of the medium should be based on what best facilitates communication and understanding.
DPMAP requires a formal documented face-to-face discussion, typically a performance appraisal, to communicate between an agency and its employees. The format of the documentation, whether written, slide deck, or video, is flexible but must facilitate effective communication.
Under the Defense Performance Management and Appraisal Program (DPMAP), a formal documented face-to-face discussion is required to ensure effective performance management and communication between the agency and its employees. This formal discussion is generally a performance appraisal meeting wherein the supervisor and the employee discuss the performance over the appraisal period.
There is no strict requirement on the format of the documentation used during these discussions. The choice between a traditional written document or another medium, such as a slide deck or video presentation, would depend on the agency's guidelines and what is most effective for clearly communicating the necessary information. The key is that the requirements do create a regular conversation between the agency and its political principals about how well it is functioning and what improvements could be made.