Final answer:
The author claims that 'the bagel wars are impossible to settle' due to the complexity and lack of decisive evidence supporting one perspective over another, revealing a situation where personal anecdotes and emotional appeals may overshadow hard facts.
Step-by-step explanation:
The author of the passage suggests that "the bagel wars are impossible to settle" because there are multiple interpretations and limited conclusive evidence to definitively determine an outcome. This implies a situation with varying opinions and not enough factual data to support one single conclusion above others. From the provided reference information, we can deduce that the author may relay on anecdotal or emotional evidence rather than indisputable facts, leading to biased or incomplete analysis.
For instance, there is mention of causing cause-and-effect reasoning, which could indicate a weak foundation for making a definitive statement. In addition, the idea of not considering alternative conclusions suggests a lack of comprehensive examination. The author also seems to fail in adequately refuting counterclaims or appealing to logical reasoning and emotions, which are critical for robust argumentation.