asked 174k views
4 votes
According to the Coaching Competencies Rubric, coaches ask targeted follow-up questions and respond to the coachee's answers in ways that encourage reflection and self-assessment. When coaching teachers, at which level of the rubric would an assistant principal's practice be, if he/she rarely uses paraphrasing, open-ended questions, or summarizing, to respond to the coachee?

A. Highly Effective
B. Effective
C. Developing
D. Ineffective

asked
User Ferox
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

An assistant principal rarely using targeted questioning techniques like paraphrasing and open-ended questions would be rated as 'Ineffective' on the Coaching Competencies Rubric.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the Coaching Competencies Rubric, coaches are expected to use techniques like paraphrasing, asking open-ended questions, and summarizing to encourage reflection and self-assessment. If an assistant principal, when coaching teachers, rarely uses paraphrasing, open-ended questions, or summarizing, this practice would most likely be evaluated as Ineffective on the Coaching Competencies Rubric. Effective coaching requires much more than simply providing answers; it necessitates engaging the coachee in a way that promotes their own critical thinking and development, which the assistant principal is currently not accomplishing to a satisfactory level.

answered
User Royherma
by
9.0k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.