asked 82.3k views
1 vote
Respiratory protection equipment for healthcare workers is:

a. Unnecessary in HIV patient situations.
b. Warranted only if a patient has been diagnosed with TB.
c. Effective only if properly fitted and appropriately worn in all areas where risk of exposure is high.
d. Primarily used with patients who are coinfected with hepatitis.

asked
User DAiMor
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Healthcare workers require properly fitted respiratory protection equipment in high-risk exposure areas to protect against airborne pathogens, notwithstanding the type of infection. Respiratory protection is especially relevant with the rise of antibiotic-resistant organisms and in laboratories managing BSL-3 agents.

Step-by-step explanation:

Respiratory protection equipment is critical in healthcare settings not just for specific diseases but wherever there is a risk of airborne pathogens. This equipment is effective only if properly fitted and appropriately worn in areas where the risk of exposure is high. Despite the advent of antimicrobial drugs and vaccines, rising antibiotic resistance, especially in the case of pathogens like Mycobacterium tuberculosis, has led to an increased need for physical protection measures such as HEPA filtration in hospital ventilation systems and personal protective equipment (PPE). In the context of HIV, respiratory protection is not primarily needed, as HIV transmission does not occur through the respiratory route.

Instead, healthcare workers focus on the management of HIV/AIDS through the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and other treatment modalities. Nevertheless, effective respiratory protective measures are vital in laboratories handling BSL-3 agents, such as HIV, as part of broader infection control practices.

answered
User Orphamiel
by
7.5k points