asked 113k views
5 votes
If Sam, a high school senior, promises to go to school every day in exchange for an "A" in his history class, his promise will most likely:

a. Be considered illusory.
b. Be found to lack consideration as he had a preexisting duty to attend school.
c. Be considered de facto.
d. Be upheld as entering into a unilateral contract.

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

Sam's promise to attend school in exchange for an "A" lacks consideration as attending school is a preexisting duty and not valid consideration for a contract in legal terms.

Step-by-step explanation:

If Sam, a high school senior, promises to go to school every day in exchange for an "A" in his history class, his promise will most likely be found to lack consideration as he had a preexisting duty to attend school. In contract law, a promise to do something that one is already legally obligated to do is not valid consideration for a contract. Since Sam is presumably required by law to attend school, his promise does not constitute new consideration that would make the contract for an "A" enforceable.

answered
User Tyssen
by
8.5k points