Final answer:
A buyer suing a broker for not properly inspecting a house may cite legal principles or cases specific to real estate law on disclosure obligations. The relevant legal terms here are 'material facts' and 'caveat emptor', indicating the evolving duty of sellers and agents to disclose defects, countered by historical buyer responsibility.
Step-by-step explanation:
If a buyer were to sue a broker for not properly inspecting a house and revealing material facts, she could potentially cite a landmark case or rely on the principles of real estate law that establish a broker's duty to disclose material information to the buyer. While there isn't a single case that would universally apply, lawsuits in such scenarios often involve claims of negligence or misrepresentation. The phrase 'caveat emptor' or 'let the buyer beware' is relevant in this context, indicating that historically buyers have the responsibility to perform due diligence before purchasing. However, modern consumer protection laws and real estate regulations have created standards requiring sellers and their agents to disclose known material defects. The specific case a buyer might cite would depend on the jurisdiction and the precise legal claims involved.
In the realm of advertising, as noted by the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) stance, although exaggerated or ambiguous language and images are tolerated, outright false facts are prohibited. While this concept broadly applies to consumer protection in advertising, real estate transactions also have strict disclosure requirements that brokers must follow.