Final answer:
The specific crime for which the prime suspect had been previously imprisoned is not detailed; however, legal principles and the implications of incarceration on individuals, particularly regarding constitutional rights and recidivism, are discussed.
Step-by-step explanation:
The crime for which the prime suspect had been previously imprisoned is not specified directly in the provided information. To understand the context, we need to look at various legal principles, legal cases, and implications related to those incarcerated for different crimes. For example, Miranda's case highlights the importance of constitutional rights during the arrest and interrogation process. Meanwhile, the story of the two co-conspiratorial criminals illustrates the strategy police might use in interrogation known as the 'prisoner's dilemma.' This technique aims to coerce confessions when evidence may be lacking. The scenarios provided also discuss the consequences of previous convictions on individuals, such as a convicted sexual offender who reoffends quickly after being paroled, which can be explained through labeling theory in a judicial context. Additionally, considerations around juvenile incarceration and the effectiveness of diversion programs over prison sentences for reducing recidivism are also discussed, bridging the topic of criminal justice and its reforms.