Final answer:
The congeniality of the U.S. legal system is subjective; Pennsylvania's constitution was not conservative but rather democratic; and the U.S. typically has lower voting rates compared to countries like Sweden and South Korea.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the United States is characterized by its congenial legal system is subjective and can be seen as true or false depending on the context and perspective. The American political system strives for fairness and provides citizens with a significant level of liberty and equality. This is reflected in the dual court system, where both positive and negative aspects can be identified. A positive of this system is that it allows for a diversity of legal opinions and local control, while a negative might be the potential for complexity and duplication of efforts.
In terms of history, the statement that Pennsylvania adopted one of the most conservative constitutions of the Revolutionary Era is false. Pennsylvania's constitution was actually one of the most democratic and radical at the time.
Further exploring social systems, the United States has historically been seen as an individualist society, valuing and protecting individual rights. Oppositionally, communitarian systems emphasize the community and the common good, placing more emphasis on collective goals rather than individual liberties.Regarding voting rates, the statement that they are higher in the United States compared to other democratic industrialized countries is false. Voting rates in the US have typically been lower than those in countries like Sweden and South Korea.