asked 131k views
1 vote
How could these ideas be implemented in a school? Federal Law No. 29 of 2006, is the first law in the UAE to protect the rights of people of determination. Article 12 of the law provides: the country guarantees people with special needs equal opportunities in education within all educational, vocational training, adult education, and continuing education institutions in regular classes or special classes with the availability of curriculum in sign language or Braille and or any other methods as appropriate.

Option A: Establishing inclusive classrooms with specialized teaching methods.
Option B: Creating separate educational institutions for people of determination.
Option C: Ignoring the law and maintaining the existing system.
Option D: Providing limited educational opportunities for people with special needs.

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

To comply with Federal Law No. 29 of 2006 in the UAE, schools should establish inclusive classrooms with specialized teaching methods to ensure equal educational opportunities for people of determination, which reflects historical inclusive practices from laws such as the IDEA.

Step-by-step explanation:

The most appropriate way to implement Federal Law No. 29 of 2006 in schools, which protects the rights of people of determination, is through Option A: Establishing inclusive classrooms with specialized teaching methods. This aligns with the inclusive educational practices historical precedence such as the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Inclusive education is supported by requirements for schools to create individualized educational plans that cater to the specific needs of each student with disabilities, ensuring they receive the same quality of education as their peers.

This approach has been shown to improve the educational achievement and post-high school success of students with disabilities. Option B, creating separate institutions, could lead to segregation and is contrary to the principles of equal opportunity. Option C, ignoring the law, and Option D, providing limited opportunities, are not only against the law but also unethical and harmful to the empowerment and education of people with determination.

answered
User Bjhuffine
by
7.7k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.