Question

Is this a logical fallacy? A researcher in teen deaths says that the number one cause for the death of teenagers is accidents (unintentional injuries). Therefore, it's true.

1) Yes, it is a logical fallacy.
2) No, it is not a logical fallacy.
3) Cannot be determined.
4) Not enough information provided.

Answer 1

Yes, it is a logical fallacy. The researcher's conclusion does not logically follow from the premise, making it a fallacy of weak induction.

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes, it is a logical fallacy.

The researcher has made a hasty generalization by assuming that accidents are the number one cause of teen deaths based on limited information. This conclusion may not be true for all cases and is therefore fallacious.

A logical fallacy is an error in reasoning that makes an argument invalid or weak. In this case, the researcher's conclusion does not logically follow from the premise, making it a fallacy of weak induction.