asked 218k views
3 votes
When considering costs of a new system conversion, which is NOT a common cost to consider?

a) the cost of running two systems with a parallel conversion
b) the costs of more staff at more locations for support in a simultaneous conversion
c) the salary costs of users, trainers, administrators, consultants
d) the hardware costs for a pilot system
e) the extra programming costs for a modular conversion

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

e) the extra programming costs for a modular conversion. While most system conversion costs are expected,

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer is option e) the extra programming costs for a modular conversion. When considering the costs of a new system conversion, certain expenses are typically anticipated.

These include the cost of running parallel systems during a conversion (option a), the cost associated with staffing support for a simultaneous conversion (option b), and salary expenses for various personnel involved in the conversion process (option c).

Additionally, hardware investments for setting up a pilot system to test before full-scale implementation (option d) are expected. However, modular conversions are designed to introduce the new system in modules or phases, which can actually reduce programming complexities and costs compared to a full-scale conversion all at once.

Therefore, extra programming costs would generally not be higher for a modular conversion and might, in some cases, be lower due to the phased approach allowing for adjustments along the way.

answered
User Aditya Patawari
by
8.4k points

No related questions found