Final answer:
The difference between causal and non-causal theories aligns with the distinction between explanatory and constitutive theories, with the former focusing on cause and effect and the latter on the definition and structure of phenomena.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distinction between causal and non-causal theories can loosely align with the concepts of explanatory theories and constitutive theories. While explanatory theories attempt to elucidate why phenomena occur—providing a causal explanation, constitutive theories are concerned with how certain phenomena or concepts are established or defined within a particular context. This means that while explanatory theories capture relationships of cause and effect, constitutive theories may not focus on causation at all, but rather on the properties or structures that constitute a particular entity or concept.
It is also important to note that the realms of scientific inquiry such as experiments do aim to establish causal links, yet they might present challenges and are not devoid of potential errors. This underscores the truth that while laws provide a consistent account of 'what happens', theories are dynamic in nature and evolve with new discoveries. Hence, theories are ever-changing frameworks that capture our current understanding but are not final declarations of empirical truth.
Therefore, saying that the difference between causal and non-causal theories is also captured by the distinction between explanatory and constitutive theories is a simplification, but it helps to illustrate the fundamental difference in purpose and application between these types of theories.