asked 92.3k views
2 votes
The seller is not liable because the buyer should not have incurred the $1,500 cost before the sale.

A) Seller is liable
B) Seller is not liable
C) Split the cost
D) Skip liability issues

1 Answer

6 votes

Final Answer:

The seller is not liable because the buyer should not have incurred the $1,500 cost before the sale. Option B is the answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

In a business transaction, it is generally the buyer's responsibility to be aware of the terms and conditions. If the buyer incurred a cost of $1,500 before the sale without proper agreement or authorization, the seller is not typically liable for that expense. Buyers should exercise due diligence and follow agreed-upon procedures to avoid incurring costs that are not the responsibility of the seller. The principle of prudence and clear contractual terms helps establish liability in such situations.

Option B is the answer.

answered
User Evan Friedland
by
8.6k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.