Final answer:
False, Berkeley does not believe in the independent existence of secondary qualities; for him, objects and their properties are indistinguishable without perception.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question of whether Berkeley believed in the existence of secondary qualities is grounded in his philosophical approach known as immaterialism, which denies the existence of matter outside of perception. False: According to Berkeley, secondary qualities do not exist independently of the perceiver. Berkeley argues that objects and their properties are inseparable, and thus, when the sensible properties are removed, there is no material object left. Secondary qualities, such as color, taste, and sound, are not inherent in objects themselves but are the result of perceptions by the mind. Consequently, without a mind to perceive them, these qualities would not exist. This stance was in contrast to John Locke, who differentiated between primary qualities, which he believed exist within the object, and secondary qualities, which are produced by the interaction between primary qualities and the perceiver's senses.